Bowles v. Good Luck Glove Co.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff charges that defendant, subsequent to May 11, 1942, sold certain of its products above what constituted proper ceilings fixed, under the statute, by the regulations of the Office of Price Administration, and seeks a preliminary injunction from continuation of such practice.
*943Defendant is an extensive manufacturer of work gloves, listing in its catalogue some 480 different models. Some of these are for children, some for ladies and others are mittens, with none of which we are now concerned. Defendant’s business, as a result of many years’ operation, is…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Bowles v. Krasno Bros. Glove & Mitten Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1945
- Bowles v. Good Luck Glove Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Bowles v. Good Luck Glove Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Bowles v. Keller Glove Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945