Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Ammon
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided June 14, 1945No. Civ. A. 257PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DELEHANT, District Judge.
Upon the basis of the defendants’ alleged sales from and after November 6, 1943, of three types of gasoline engines of their own manufacture at unit prices in excess of the limitations prescribed in Maximum Price Regulation (hereafter abbreviated as M PR) 136, as amended, 1 the plaintiff prays for, (a) permanent injunctive relief against the continuance of the practice; and (b) a money judgment in a sum three times the aggregate amount of the overcharges.
No questions are presented respecting the constitutionality of the applicable statute or the general validity of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Coverdale v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Zimberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kempe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Bowles v. GoebelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- United States Ex Rel. Porter v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Bowles v. WeitzDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Bowles v. WardDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.