Legal Opinion
Mercado v. Brannan
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 25, 1949No. 4386PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
This is the second appearance before us of this action for treble damages, under § 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 925(e), for the sale of cane blackstrap molasses at 'an overceiling price. The facts are stated in our earlier opinion, Anderson v. Mercado, 1 Cir., 163 F.2d 303, certiorari denied Mercado v. Anderson, 332 U.S. 837, 68 S.Ct. 220, remanding the case to the district *555court for reconsideration of its award of damages. In our view of the case there had been a substantially greater delivery of the product in violation of the law…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zimberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Bowles v. KrodelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Bowles v. FranceschiniCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- E. Anthony & Sons, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Bowles v. Krasno Bros. Glove & Mitten Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Sierra Berdecía v. San MiguelSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
- Méndez & Co. v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. BecentiNavajo Nation Court of Appeals · 1983
- Mora v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.