Legal Opinion

Haber v. Garthly

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 10, 1946No. Civil Action 5444PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

This is an action under section 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 1 to recover treble damages, together with reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, for failure to refund rent received in excess of the maximum rent fixed in accordance with the provisions of that Act.

On the basis of the pleadings and the testimony, I make the following special

Findings of Fact.

1. Defendants, William Garthly and Elizabeth V. Weintraub, are, and at all material times have been, the owners and lessors of the apartment building at 315 Harrison Avenue, Elkins Park, Montgomery…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lockerty v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Zimberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
  3. Bowles v. Indianapolis Glove Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  4. Bowles v. BatsonDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1945
  5. Bowles v. Krasno Bros. Glove & Mitten Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Creedon v. BabcockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  2. Gorbacheff v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Connor v. WheelerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Foust Distilling Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API