Legal Opinion

Petty v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

A judgment for the plaintiff upon the pleadings has the same effect as sustaining a demurrer to the answer, and requires that the defendant’s pleading shall be given the most favorable interpretation and every intendment taken against the plaintiff. Barnes v. Trust Co., 194 N. C., 371; Pridgen v. Pridgen, 190 N. C., 102.

It is necessary, therefore, to examine the allegations of the answer in accord with this rule.

After admitting the issuance of the policy sued on and the death of the insured, the defendant interposed the defense that the policy had lapsed for failure to pay the premiums due…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whitehurst v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Pridgen v. . PridgenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Abernethy v. . BurnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Stone v. Doctors' Lake Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Ghormley v. . HyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Cotton Mills v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Berwer v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Foxman v. . HanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Gray v. EdmondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API