Pridgen v. . Pridgen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtVarser, J.
The plaintiff’s motion for judgment upon the answer is, in effect, a demurrer to the answer, and can only prevail when the matters pleaded constitute an admission of plaintiff’s cause of action or are insufficient as a defense or constitute new matter insufficient in law to defeat plaintiff’s claim. Alston v. Hill, 165 N. C., 255, 258; Churchwell v. Trust Co., 181 N. C., 21. Under C. S., 535, we construe the defendants’ answer liberally, with a view to substantiate justice between the parties. This means that every reasonable intendment must be taken in favor of the pleader, and if the answer…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Avery v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Stokes v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Brewer v. . WynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Shields v. . WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- City of Raleigh v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Guerry v. American Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Sale v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Cody v. . HoveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.