Legal Opinion

Pridgen v. . Pridgen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1925PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarser, J.

The plaintiff’s motion for judgment upon the answer is, in effect, a demurrer to the answer, and can only prevail when the matters pleaded constitute an admission of plaintiff’s cause of action or are insufficient as a defense or constitute new matter insufficient in law to defeat plaintiff’s claim. Alston v. Hill, 165 N. C., 255, 258; Churchwell v. Trust Co., 181 N. C., 21. Under C. S., 535, we construe the defendants’ answer liberally, with a view to substantiate justice between the parties. This means that every reasonable intendment must be taken in favor of the pleader, and if the answer…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Avery v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Stokes v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Brewer v. . WynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Shields v. . WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. City of Raleigh v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Guerry v. American Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Sale v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Cody v. . HoveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API