Legal Opinion

Stone v. Doctors' Lake Milling Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1926PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The following appears in the statement of case on appeal:

“Plaintiff having announced before the introduction of evidence that the cause of action was based on tort for damages for false and fraudulent representations, and the court being of the opinion that upon such cause .of action and evidence offered the plaintiff is not entitled to recover, allowed the motion of the defendant for judgment as of nonsuit.”

We cannot hold this ruling to be erroneous, as no action for the tort of deceit is set out in the complaint. It is not alleged that the false representations, upon which plaintiff says he…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Whitehurst v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Helms v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Ricks v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Galloway v. . GoolsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Tarault v. . SeipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Carver v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Cotton Mills v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Small v. DorsettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Harrison v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API