Legal Opinion

Gray v. Edmonds

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1950No. 528PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The defendants’ demurrer ore tenus to the complaint cannot be sustained. Sufficient facts are alleged to constitute a cause of action for relief on the ground of fraud.

The defendants’ motion for judgment of nonsuit was properly denied. Considering the plaintiffs’ evidence in the light most favorable for them, it is apparent that it was sufficient to carry the case to the jury on the issue of actionable fraud. Whitehurst v. Ins. Co., 149 N.C. 273, 62 S.E. 1067; Petty v. Ins. Co., 210 N.C. 500, 187 S.E. 816; Ward v. Heath, 222 N.C. 470, 24 S.E. 2d 5; Atkinson v. Charlotte Builders, ante, 67, 59…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Phillips Walsh v. . Rufus D. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  2. Whitehurst v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Ward v. . HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Harding v. Southern Loan & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Ward v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hardy v. TolerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Johnson v. OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Swinton v. Savoy Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Keith v. WilderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API