Ghormley v. . Hyatt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtOlaeksoN, J.
The court below refused to submit the following issue tendered by plaintiffs: “Was the note and mortgage of 5 July, 1926, obtained by fraud and misrepresentation, as alleged in the complaint?” We think the court below correct.
In Electric Co. v. Morrison, 194 N. C., 316 (317), it is said: “The essential elements of actionable fraud or deceit are the representation, its falsity, scienter, deception, and injury. The representation must be definite and specific; it must be materially false; it must be made with knowledge of its falsity or in culpable ignorance of its truth; it must be made with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller v. . DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Stone v. Doctors' Lake Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Leggett Electric Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Peyton v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Wilson v. Union Trust Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Henderson v. SECURITY MORTAGAGE AND FINANCE CO.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Bowen v. Mount Vernon Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Atkinson v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Atkinson v. . AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Berwer v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.