Abernethy v. . Burns
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
It was clearly within the discretion of the court, for cause shown, to place the case at the end of the trial docket. But it is provided by C. S., 401 that a party may appear “either in person or by attorney in actions or proceedings in which he is interested.” Thus, the provision requiring plaintiff to employ counsel would seem to be at variance with the statute.
It is the general holding that a party has the right to appear in propria persona or by counsel. This right is alternative. A party has no right to appear both by himself and by counsel. Nor should he be permitted ex gratia to do so.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Board of Commissioners (No. 2) v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. PhillipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Lizarríbar v. Martínez GelpíSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1988
- Cersosimo v. CersosimoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.