Legal Opinion

Berwer v. Union Central Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1938PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WiNBORN®, J.

Conceding, but not deciding, that tbe plaintiffs are tbe real parties in interest and can maintain tbis action, C. S., 446, we are of opinion that tbe evidence offered by tbe plaintiffs is not sufficient to establish all of tbe essential elements of actionable fraud. Tbis is decisive of tbe case. Motion for judgment as of nonsuit was properly granted.

“The essential elements of actionable fraud or deceit are tbe representation, its falsity, scienter, deception, and injury. Tbe representation must be definite and specific; it must be materially false; it must be made with knowledge…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. May v. . LoomisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Cash Register Co. v. . TownsendSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Leggett Electric Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Tarault v. . SeipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Peyton v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Spartan Leasing Inc. v. PollardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Johnson v. OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Schlieper v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API