People v. $20,000 United States Currency
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS Acting P. J.
—While the substantive nature of this action is forfeiture, this appeal is concerned solely with the narrowly circumscribed question of whether the time granted to file an amended petition was extended by five days under the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 1013. The ruling in question granted a motion for judgment on the pleadings with leave to amend. Notice of that ruling was mailed to the losing party, who had also been present through an attorney at the time of the ruling. The trial court held that the time was not extended by mailing the notice of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hamaker v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Mallory v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Barron v. DelevalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Sofias v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Hardy v. Admiral Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Airlines, Inc. v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Dudley v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Evans v. California Trailer Court, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Hightower v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- California Business Council v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.