Legal Opinion
California Business Council v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 19, 1997No. C024875PublishedCited by 5 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
In the published part of the opinion in this writ proceeding 1 we determine that the time within which to file a peremptory challenge to the “all-purpose” assignment of a trial court judge (Code Civ. Proc., § 170.6, subd. (2)) 2 is extended when “notice” of the assignment is served by mail (§ 1013, subd. (a)).
Facts
In the underlying dispute the real party in interest, Governor of the State of California (real party), brought a proceeding in mandate against various state officials to compel them to discontinue enforcement of various provisions of the Education,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Poster v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Camper v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Augustyn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Citicorp North America, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Connerly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Motion Picture & Television Fund Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Silver v. McNameeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Salinas v. Superior Court CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Salinas v. Superior Court CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2015