Legal Opinion

Hightower v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1995No. B077599PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Plaintiffs and appellants Ruth Hightower (Hightower), Alicia Flowers (Flowers) and Coralene Hayes (Hayes) (sometimes collectively referred to as Hightower) appeal a judgment following a grant of judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendant and respondent Farmers Insurance Exchange (Farmers).

The issues presented are whether exhaustion of administrative remedies under the California Automobile Assigned Risk Plan (the CAARP) is a prerequisite to the filing of a bad faith action against an insurer under an uninsured motorist policy, and whether a cause of action may be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Landrum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. David Singer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Wilson v. 21st Century InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Brehm v. 21st Century InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Marzec v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API