Legal Opinion
Dudley v. Department of Transportation
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 2001No. C036154PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
Plaintiff Carla R. Dudley (hereafter Dudley) appeals from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of her former employer, defendant Department of Transportation (hereafter Caltrans). Dudley contends her complaint states, or could be amended to state, facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against Caltrans for retaliating against her for taking medical leave, in violation of the Moore-Brown-Roberti Family Rights Act (Gov. Code, §§ 12945.1, 12945.2, hereafter CFRA). We agree that Dudley’s complaint could be amended to state a retaliation claim under CFRA and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Morgan v. Hilti, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Hodgens v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Xin Liu v. Amway Corporation Does 1-50 InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Graham v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Faust v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Rogers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Alejandro v. St Micro Electronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.