Evans v. California Trailer Court, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THAXTER, J.
We decide here that the antideflciency statutes do not bar an action under the following circumstances:
1) The seller/beneficiary holds two trust deeds on the same real property, each securing a separate note for $300,000;
2) The seller/beneficiary reacquires the property at a nonjudicial foreclosure sale of the senior deed of tmst with a credit bid which is less than the full amount of indebtedness secured by the two deeds of tmst; and,
3) The action seeks damages from the buyers/trustors on various tort theories.
Facts and Procedural History
Plaintiffs William and Peggy Evans…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. ReederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Smith v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Ragland v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Pang v. Beverly Hospital, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Thomson v. CanyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.