Legal Opinion

Stewart v. City of Salem

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 14, 2009No. 2009009; A142161PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Respondent City of Salem (the city) seeks review of an opinion and order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) that reversed the city’s denial of petitioner’s application for approval of a tentative partition plan. The city contends that LUBA erred in concluding that petitioner adequately preserved his objections to the denial of the partition request. The city also asserts that LUBA erred in reversing, rather than remanding, the city’s order denying the partition plan application. Both contentions question the board’s interpretation of applicable statutes, requiring us to review LUBA’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reusser v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Gisler v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Holland v. City of Cannon BeachOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Nicholson v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. PLISKA v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Friends of Yamhill County v. City of NewbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Stewart v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. FRIENDS OF YAMHILL CTY. v. City of NewbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. PLISKA v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API