Legal Opinion

Holland v. City of Cannon Beach

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1996No. LUBA 95-049; CA A90660; SC S43010PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a land use case. The relevant procedural facts are as follows.

Holland filed an application with the City of Cannon Beach (the City) to develop an 11-lot residential subdivision. The City denied that application, based on Holland’s failure to demonstrate compliance with five policies in the City’s comprehensive plan.

Holland appealed that decision to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), raising four assignments of error. Each assignment argued that the City had, in one way or another, misinterpreted or misapplied its own policies. LUBA affirmed the decision of the City.

After the case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hay v. Oregon Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Holland v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Recovery House VI v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Gisler v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Stewart v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Marshall v. City of YachatsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API