PLISKA v. Umatilla County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.
Petitioners seek review of a decision of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) that affirmed Umatilla County’s approval of a conditional use permit for the construction of a travel plaza on property owned by respondent Flying J, Inc. Petitioners contend that LUBA made errors of law in determining that the issue raised on appeal — that petitioners had an unqualified right to a continuance pursuant to the county’s development code — was not first properly raised before the county. LUBA specifically determined that petitioners’ letter requesting a continuance pursuant to ORS 197.763(6), submitted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Western Land & Cattle, Inc. v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- VanSpeybroeck v. Tillamook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Boldt v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Stewart v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Nicholson v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hatley v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- PLISKA v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Southcentral Ass'n of Neighbors v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015