Legal Opinion
Gisler v. Deschutes County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 10, 1997No. LUBA 96-164; CA A98218PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s affirmance of a Deschutes County hearings officer’s denial of petitioner’s application for a subdivision. We affirm.
The proposed subdivision is located in a suburban low-density residential zone and is outside the urban growth boundary (UGB). Section 19.20.055(A)(4) of the Deschutes Development Code requires that, for subdivisions and other developments or partitions of two lots or more in that zone:
“All new lots shall be connected to a Department of Environmental Quality-permitted community or municipal sewer system.”
The county code requires further that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Gage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.)Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Friends of Neabeack Hill v. City of PhilomathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- West v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Recovery House VI v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Department of Transportation v. City of Klamath FallsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Stewart v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Foland v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State ex rel. Moore v. City of FairviewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.