Legal Opinion

Friends of Yamhill County v. City of Newberg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 16, 2011No. 2010015; A146619PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Petitioners seek review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision regarding the City of Newberg’s Economic Opportunities Analysis (EOA), a part of its comprehensive plan. Newberg originally adopted an EOA in January 2006. In February 2010, the city council passed, over petitioners’ opposition, an ordinance adopting a revised and updated EOA. Petitioners appealed to LUBA, advancing six assignments of error. LUBA rejected some of those assignments but sustained others, resulting in a remand of the ordinance. Petitioners now seek review in this court of the assignments that LUBA rejected.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. J. R. Simplot Co. v. Department of AgricultureOregon Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. FRIENDS OF YAMHILL CTY. v. City of NewbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. D. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API