Friends of Yamhill County v. City of Newberg
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Petitioners seek review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision regarding the City of Newberg’s Economic Opportunities Analysis (EOA), a part of its comprehensive plan. Newberg originally adopted an EOA in January 2006. In February 2010, the city council passed, over petitioners’ opposition, an ordinance adopting a revised and updated EOA. Petitioners appealed to LUBA, advancing six assignments of error. LUBA rejected some of those assignments but sustained others, resulting in a remand of the ordinance. Petitioners now seek review in this court of the assignments that LUBA rejected.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- J. R. Simplot Co. v. Department of AgricultureOregon Supreme Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- FRIENDS OF YAMHILL CTY. v. City of NewbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. D. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016