Legal Opinion

Stewart v. City of Salem

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 26, 2011No. 2009009; A146479PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (“LUBA” or “the board”) order denying him an award of attorney fees after he obtained a favorable decision against the City of Salem on his underlying application to partition his property. Petitioner acted pro se at all relevant times during the proceedings before the board, although he received advice and assistance from an attorney, Hoelscher. Petitioner argues that he is entitled to attorney fees under ORS 197.835(10)(b), which requires the board to “award attorney fees” to a land use applicant where the board reverses a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colby v. GunsonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Parquit Corporation v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Anderson v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Stewart v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Colby v. GunsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stewart v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API