Legal Opinion
Reusser v. Washington County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 28, 1993No. LUBA 92-212; CA A79803PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, C. J.
Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s decision reversing Washington County’s approval of a lot line adjustment affecting two lots in adjacent rural planned developments (RPDs). We reverse.
LUBA held that the county’s interpretation and application of its ordinance was “clearly wrong,” within the meaning of Goose Hollow Foothills League v. City of Portland, 117 Or App 211, 217, 843 P2d 992 (1992). Therefore, LUBA concluded that the county’s interpretation was not affirmable under Clark v. Jackson County, 313 Or 508, 515, 836 P2d 710 (1992), which requires LUBA to accept a local government’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Goose Hollow Foothills League v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Cope v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- West v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. BryanUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Friends of the Metolius v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Gage v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Art Piculell Group v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Recovery House VI v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.