Legal Opinion
Fogler v. Purkiser
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 18, 1932No. Docket No. 179PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMES, J., pro tem.
This is an action to compel the specific performance of a contract to convey real estate. The parties to this action are the children and heirs at law of Alice A. Fogler, who died intestate in San Bernardino County on the twenty-sixth day of October, 1928. During her lifetime she was the owner of a tract of land consisting of 40 acres, which throughout this opinion will be designated as parcel one, and certain real property in the city of Red-lands, San Bernardino County, improved with a dwelling-house thereon, in which she resided at the time of her death and which is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Bagley v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Cates v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Hanrahan-Wilcox Corp. v. Jenison MacHinery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Reeves v. HutsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Bauer v. MonroeMontana Supreme Court · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.