Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Hutson

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 14, 1956No. Civ. 16783PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff secured a default judgment against defendants. Subsequently the default was set aside. Thereafter, the trial court entered an order quashing execution, an order dismissing the action, and an order denying plaintiff’s motion to restrain defendants from disposing of property or to post bond. From these three orders plaintiff appeals.

The facts are somewhat confusing. On October 18, 1949, plaintiff brought an action in San Francisco against defendants for $13,563.14 for services rendered and for money had and received. Service was had on defendants in Santa Cruz County on October 19,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Rose v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Lake v. BonyngeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Goldborten v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In Re Matthew C.California Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Elsea v. SaberiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Jacuzzi v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Lennane v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API