Harding v. Robinson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The essentials of this controversy may be thus stated: Plaintiff Lombard desired to purchase a tract of land owned by defendant Robinson. They entered into a written agreement providing for the placing in the hands of the defendant, Title Guarantee and Trust Company, certain papers accompanied by instructions governing the conduct of the escrowee in regard thereto. In brief, this agreement was as follows: Lombard was to pay a certain amount in cash and execute a series of promissory notes each for one thousand dollars falling due a month apart. A deed to the property was to be executed by…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Wadhams v. SwanIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Riverisland Cold Storage, Inc. v. Fresno-Madera Production Credit Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. PendergrassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.