Legal Opinion
Pima County v. Gonzalez
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 19, 1998No. 2 CA-CV 97-0140PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRAMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 Pima County brought a condemnation action against appellants, Ramon and Rojelia Gonzalez, to acquire a sewer easement over a portion of their property. The Gonzalezes appeal from a $6,050 jury verdict in their favor, asserting that the award does not reflect “just compensation.” They argue that (1) the trial court erroneously rejected their requested jury instructions on property valuation and severance damages, (2) the jury heard or considered improper evidence of a special benefit, and (3) Pima County elicited inappropriate evidence about its likely “minimal use”…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Calmat of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Walkenhorst v. State, Department of RoadsNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Callender v. Transpacific Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Dixon v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Maricopa County v. BarkleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Powers v. Taser International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Jimenez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- STATE FARM FIRE & CAS. IN. CO. v. GrabowskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance v. GrabowskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.