Legal Opinion
Calmat of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. Miller
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 1993No. CV-92-0173-PRPublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORCORAN, Justice.
This case arises from two separate condemnation proceedings, consolidated for trial, between the State of Arizona and Cal-mat of Arizona. We granted the state’s cross-petition for review under rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, regarding one of these proceedings. The relevant proceeding involves the state’s appropriation of 2 parcels of Calmat’s land near Interstate 10 (I — 10) and 24th Street in Phoenix. The issue is:
Where physical entry precedes the filing of a summons in an inverse condemnation case, should the date of valuation be the date of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Maxey v. Redevelopment Authority of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- ChartOne, Inc. v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. ThuesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. TierneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.