Legal Opinion

Dixon v. City of Phoenix

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 16, 1992No. 1 CA-CV 90-245PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the superior court in two consolidated cases involving the condemnation by the City of Phoenix (the “City”) of a permanent easement for the construction and maintenance of a water pipeline across a portion of property belonging to Jimmie and Carolyn Dixon (“the Dixons”). The issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly excluded from the final judgment damages for the destruction of vegetation on the Dixons’ property both within and outside the easement area that occurred during the construction of the pipeline.

I

On…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Hadley v. Southwest Properties, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Thatcher v. Lane Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1970

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. McCarran International Airport v. SisolakNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. S.O.C., Inc. v. Mirage Casino-HotelNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Amerco v. ShoenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. United Dairymen of Arizona v. SchuggCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API