Legal Opinion
State v. Reyes
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 2, 2013No. 1 CA-CR 12-0163PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORTLEY, Judge.
¶ 1 Defendant Garland Reyes, III, appeals his convictions and sentences for possession *470of marijuana, including the order requiring him to pay for statutorily-mandated DNA testing. For the reasons that follow, we affirm his convictions and sentences, but vacate the order requiring him to pay the DNA testing fee.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 After he was discovered mailing marijuana through the U.S. Postal Service, Reyes was indicted on seven counts of possession of marijuana for sale, as well as money laundering, conspiracy, and illegal control of an enterprise. At the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. NewellArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Hobson v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. RandlesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. CoulterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. Garcia-QuintanaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.