State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Grabowski
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company appeals a jury verdict finding that Barbara Grabowski had met her burden to show that an insurance policy exclusionary clause violated the insured’s reasonable expectations and therefore was unenforceable. State Farm contends the trial court improperly instructed the jury regarding the doe-trine of reasonable expectations. For the reasons that follow, we agree and therefore reverse and remand this case for a new trial.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 James Hedge III and his wife, Victoria, were killed in a single-vehicle automobile…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
- John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Barnes v. OutlawArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Harrington v. Pulte Home Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- DeVries v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Hudgins v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES, CO.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- STATE FARM FIRE & CAS. IN. CO. v. GrabowskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Fall v. First Mercury Insurance Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2016
- Morgan Ex Rel. Clark v. American Family Mut. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.