Legal Opinion

Powers v. Taser International, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 4, 2008No. 1 CA-CV 06-545PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 This Opinion addresses whether the hindsight test should be applied to a strict liability products claim alleging failure to warn as the defect. That test was adopted in Dart v. Wiebe Manufacturing, Inc. for strict liability products claims based on design defects. 147 Ariz. 242, 709 P.2d 876 (1985). The court expressly left open that issue as to strict liability products claims asserting a failure to warn. 147 Ariz. at 247 n. 2, 709 P.2d at 881 n. 2. For the reasons set forth below, we decline the invitation to adopt the hindsight test for such claims.

¶ 2 We also…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Woodill v. Parke Davis & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Carlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Marquez Ex Rel. Marquez v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Mendoza v. McDonald's Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. D'Agnese v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2013
  5. Conklin Et Ux v. Medtronic IncArizona Supreme Court · 2018

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API