Legal Opinion

Jimenez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 20, 2003No. 2 CA-CV 2003-0017PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this personal injury action, plaintiffs/appellants Margaret Jimenez and her husband appeal from the trial court’s judgment, entered after a jury verdict, in favor of defendant/appellee Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. She also appeals from the trial court’s subsequent denial of her motion for a new trial. Jimenez argues the trial court abused its discretion by allowing Wal-Mart to rely on a new, undisclosed legal theory at trial and by precluding certain photographic evidence. Jimenez also argues the pro tempore trial judge was prejudiced against her because,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael Rudy ThamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Englert v. Carondelet Health NetworkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. United States v. Alan Ronnie AkersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. Powell-Cerkoney v. TCR-Montana Ranch Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. State v. DarwinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. Sholes v. FernandoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. Hall v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. In Re Commitment of FrankovitchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API