Jimenez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In this personal injury action, plaintiffs/appellants Margaret Jimenez and her husband appeal from the trial court’s judgment, entered after a jury verdict, in favor of defendant/appellee Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. She also appeals from the trial court’s subsequent denial of her motion for a new trial. Jimenez argues the trial court abused its discretion by allowing Wal-Mart to rely on a new, undisclosed legal theory at trial and by precluding certain photographic evidence. Jimenez also argues the pro tempore trial judge was prejudiced against her because,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Michael Rudy ThamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Englert v. Carondelet Health NetworkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- United States v. Alan Ronnie AkersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Powell-Cerkoney v. TCR-Montana Ranch Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- State v. DarwinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Sholes v. FernandoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Hall v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- In Re Commitment of FrankovitchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.