Legal Opinion

Airoulofski v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1996No. S-6695, S-6735PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Mane Airoulofski appeals a superior court decision granting summary judgment to the Municipality of Anchorage (“Municipality”). The superior court held that Airoulofski had waived his tort claims against the Municipality by failing to prosecute his case. The Municipality cross-appeals, contesting the superior court’s earlier refusal to dismiss the case pursuant to Alaska Civil Rule 16.1.

II. FACTS & PROCEEDINGS

On December 20, 1986, the Anchorage Police Department arrested Mane Airoulofski twice. On both occasions, the police were mistaken. Alleging…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ford v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Milne v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Munn v. Bristol Bay Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Swenson Trucking & Excavating, Inc. v. Truckweld Equipment Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Miscovich v. TryckAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. McGee v. McGeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Mapco Express, Inc. v. FaulkAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Powers v. United Services Automobile Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Duffus v. DuffusAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Noey v. BledsoeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API