Legal Opinion
Noey v. Bledsoe
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided April 23, 1999No. S-7905PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
In an interpleader trial involving a fee dispute between an attorney and his client, the superior court found for the attorney. The client appeals, raising several procedural and substantive claims of error. We find no error and affirm the superior court’s judgment.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Stephen Noey hired Mark Bledsoe to represent him in January 1990. The parties’ oral contract provided that Noey would pay Bledsoe $100-$140 per hour plus costs. Bledsoe primarily worked on an Anchorage superior court ease, Noey v. Cannone, et al. 1 In November 1993, as…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Susan Cripps, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Life Insurance Company of North America, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Ahlstrom v. CummingsAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Dakota Livestock Company and Farmers Union Marketing & Processing Association v. Gary KeimCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Benton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Prentzel v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Kaiser v. SakataAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re the Adoption of Erin G.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.