Legal Opinion
Miscovich v. Tryck
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1994No. S-5503PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice, Pro Tem.
This case arises from a dispute concerning the ownership of two distinct clusters of mining claims located on Poorman Creek, denominated the Upper and Lower Poorman claims. Keith Tryck filed a superior court action to quiet title to the claims. The action was disputed by Howard Miscovich, Andrew Miscovich, and Miscovich Brothers, a mining partnership. The superior court awarded Tryck exclusive title to the Upper Poorman claims and a one-half interest in the Lower Poorman claims. The court divided the remaining half interest in the Lower Poorman claims between…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
- D.J. v. P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Rausch v. DevineAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Spenard Action Committee v. Lot 3, Block 1, Evergreen SubdivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division, Ex Rel. Valdez v. ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.