Legal Opinion

Mapco Express, Inc. v. Faulk

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2001No. S-9500PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

MAPCO Express, Inc. stockpiled snow on its property in south Anchorage, and the snow melt flowed downhill onto warehouse property owned by David Faulk, Subsequently, some areas of Faulk's warehouse suffered damage, and Faulk brought suit against MAPCO for nuisance and trespass. After a bench trial, the superior court found a trespass and awarded $106,815.48 in compensatory damages and an equal amount in punitive damages. MAPCO has appealed this judgment. We conclude that the superi- or court's factual findings on liability were sufficiently clear and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Beaulieu v. ElliottAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Koller v. ReftAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Reich v. Cominco Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Reust v. Alaska Petroleum Contractors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Fyffe v. WrightAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Simpson v. MurkowskiAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API