Legal Opinion
McGee v. McGee
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 12, 1999No. S-7965, S-7966PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The decree dissolving Debra and Ken McGee’s marriage said nothing about possible individual fishing quotas (IFQs) and quota shares. When an IFQ program was implemented soon after the dissolution, Ken applied for and received all the shares. Because marital fishing activity made both parties eligible to receive the shares, Debra successfully moved for relief from the dissolution decree. Concluding that “extraordinary circumstances” justified Alaska Civil Rule 60(b)(6) relief, we affirm in Case No. S-7966.
Debra also brought a separate tort suit against…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Lacher v. LacherAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Johnson v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Cook v. CookAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Spencer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Hopper v. HopperAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.