Legal Opinion
United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. May
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 28, 2009No. Civil Action 07-1867 (JDB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
This is a civil action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) against Richard May alleging that he violated various securities laws while an executive at Centerpulse Limited. The SEC’s complaint also contains counts against two of May’s Centerpulse colleagues, Urs Kamber and Stephan Husi, both of whom have since consented to final judgment in favor of the SEC. Now before the Court is May’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons described below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
At all times…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,266 Irene L. Wright, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. BrownDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MonterossoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Milan Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. BrownDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010