Legal Opinion
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,266 Irene L. Wright, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Young LLP
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 6, 1998No. Docket 97-9241PublishedCited by 464 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Irene Wright appeals from a final judgment rendered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Scheindlin, J., dismissing her amended class action complaint charging defendant accounting firm Ernst & Young LLP with making materially false representations in connection with BT Office Products’ sale of common stock, all in violation of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.1Ob-5. See Wright v. Ernst & Young…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by464 opinions
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. TamboneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Kleinman v. Elan Corp., plcCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Suez Equity Investors, L.P. v. Toronto-Dominion BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Gariety v. Grant Thornton, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
459 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.