Legal Opinion
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Milan Group, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 26, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-2132PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
The Securities and Exchange Commission sued The Milan Group, Inc., the law firm Baylor & Jackson, P.L.L.C., and certain individuals as “Principal Defendants” for conducting an alleged securities fraud from which victims suffered losses amounting to millions of dollars. SEC also named certain “Relief Defendants” — that is, persons who allegedly received money resulting from the fraudulent activities but who are not charged with personally engaging in the fraud. SEC seeks disgorgement from both sets of defendants for restitution to the victims. SEC…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CKB168 Holdings, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- ['U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. E-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Attorney Grievance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. E-Smart Technologies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. E-Smart Technologies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.