Legal Opinion
Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 21, 2007No. 06-484PublishedCited by 6,099 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg
This Court has long recognized that meritorious private actions to enforce federal antifraud securities laws are an essential supplement to criminal prosecutions and civil enforcement actions brought, respectively, by the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). See, e. g., Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo, 544 U. S. 336, 345 (2005); J. I. Case Co. v. Borak, 377 U. S. 426, 432 (1964). Private securities fraud actions, however, if not adequately contained, can be employed abusively to impose substantial costs on companies and individuals whose conduct…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6,099 opinions
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Gordon Goines v. Valley Community Services BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Tackett v. M & G POLYMERS, USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
6,094 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.