Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Edward D Jones & Co

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 2001No. Docket 218427PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order granting defendant Edward D. Jones & Co.’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7). We affirm.

Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) after the court refused to apply the discovery rule to plaintiffs’ conversion claim involving the negotiation of stock certificates over plaintiffs’ forged signatures. We disagree.

This Court reviews a grant of summary disposition de novo. Spiek v Dep’t of Transportation, 456 Mich 331, 337; 572 NW2d 201 (1998).…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Larson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Johnson v. CaldwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of BerkleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Specialized Loan Servicing, L.L.C. v. JanuarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
  3. Bliss Clearing Niagara, Inc. v. Midwest Brake Bond Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003
  4. Robin Lepard v. Nbd Bank, a Division of Bank One Walter O. Koch Jeremy H. Lepard and Patricia C. LepardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Estate of Hollywood v. First National Bank of PalmertonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API