Legal Opinion

Spiek v. Department of Transportation

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1998No. 104096, Calender No. 15PublishedCited by 473 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

We granted leave to appeal in this case to decide whether noise, dust, vibration, and fumes experienced by owners of property along an interstate freeway constitute a taking of a recognized property interest where the effects alleged are not unique or peculiar in character. We hold that such effects do not constitute a taking of a recognized property interest where the plaintiff fails to allege that the damages incurred are unique, special, or peculiar, or in some way different in kind or character from the effects incurred by all property owners who reside adjacent to freeways or other busy…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Richards v. Washington Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. State v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by473 opinions

  1. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Dextrom v. Wexford CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Walsh v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Belle Isle Grill Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of BerkleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

468 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API