Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Caldwell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1963No. Calendar 44, 45, Docket 49,896, 49,897PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

On review here is the order of the trial court denying motions for new trials and for judgments non obstantibus'veredictis.

The judgments are upon a consolidation of 2 suits for trial. One is by Nathaniel Johnson for loss of consortium and for expense incurred by him for medical services rendered to his wife. The other is by the wife, Alberta Johnson, in her own name, for pain, suffering, and permanent injury to her nervous system.

The declarations initiating the actions, as originally filed on January 27,1959, both contained single counts. Both, were trespass actions alleging negli gence on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Stewart v. RudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. De Haan v. WinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Draws v. LevinMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Eschenbacher v. HierMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Oliver v. Kaiser Community Health FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Chrischilles v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  5. Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API