Legal Opinion

Estate of Hollywood v. First National Bank of Palmerton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 2004PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 In this appeal, we consider whether the limitations periods established under Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) sections 3-118(g) and 4-406(f) apply mechanically to bar actions for conversion and related claims without regard to the alleged incapacity of the aggrieved party when the alleged conversion occurred. Plaintiff James C. Hollywood, Administrator of the Estate of Cletus J. Hollywood (the Estate), contends that mechanical application is neither required nor appropriate under such circumstances, and that the limitations periods should be tolled by the “discovery…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Pero's Steak and Spaghetti House v. LeeTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Kuwait Airways Corporation v. American Security Bank, N.A. And First American Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Gerard C. Menichini, T/a Best Legal Services v. Lissa L. Grant Mellon Bank (East), Mellon Bank (East) National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Swartley v. HoffnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Cardenas v. SchoberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dr. Linda A. Rodrigue v. Olin Employees Credit Union, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Bucci v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Specialized Loan Servicing, L.L.C. v. JanuarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
  4. Marlon Mormann v. Iowa Workforce DevelopmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  5. Fiedler, E. v. Spencer, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API