Legal Opinion

Moll v. Abbott Laboratories

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1993No. Docket Nos. 93309, 93310, 91561, (Calendar Nos. 3-4)PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, C.J.

In these pharmaceutical products liability actions, we are asked to determine when a cause of action for latent toxic injuries accrues for statute of limitations purposes. We hold that the discovery rule controls the determination of when a cause of action accrues in a pharmaceutical products liability action. Thus, the statute of limitations begins to run when the plaintiff discovers or, through the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have discovered a possible cause of action. Furthermore, we hold that in the absence of disputed facts, the question whether a plaintiff’s action is…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Bowen v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Henderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Bertrand v. Alan Ford, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. McCORMICK v. CARRIERMichigan Supreme Court · 2010

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API