Moll v. Abbott Laboratories
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, C.J.
In these pharmaceutical products liability actions, we are asked to determine when a cause of action for latent toxic injuries accrues for statute of limitations purposes. We hold that the discovery rule controls the determination of when a cause of action accrues in a pharmaceutical products liability action. Thus, the statute of limitations begins to run when the plaintiff discovers or, through the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have discovered a possible cause of action. Furthermore, we hold that in the absence of disputed facts, the question whether a plaintiff’s action is…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bowen v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Henderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Bertrand v. Alan Ford, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
- McCORMICK v. CARRIERMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.