Legal Opinion
Robin Lepard v. Nbd Bank, a Division of Bank One Walter O. Koch Jeremy H. Lepard and Patricia C. Lepard
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 8, 2004No. 02-1887PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
Robin Lepard, proceeding pro se, brought suit against the defendants based upon their alleged unlawful interference with the financial assistance that Robin had been receiving from her mother. The named defendants were the National Bank of Detroit, a division of Bank One (NBD), Walter Koch, Jeremy Lepard, and Patricia Lepard. Koch had served as the attorney for Lepard’s parents, Cecil and Elizabeth Lepard, and was the drafter of Dr. Cecil Lepard’s trusts. He later served as counsel for the trusts’ cotrustees, NBD and Lepard’s mother Elizabeth. Jeremy Le-pard is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mayer v. MylodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Markham v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Good v. Ohio Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Ninety-Three (93) Firearms, and Assorted Firearm Parts and Ammunition, Larry Z. Short, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Fred T. McKibben v. Janet A. Chubb, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., Leland Morris, Jr., and Virginia MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Caroline Chevalier v. Kimberly BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Estate of William R. Barney, J v. PNC Bank, National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. Healthcare Benefits Plan v. DurdenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Amadasu v. the Christ Hosp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.