Legal Opinion
Metromedia, Inc. v. City of Pasadena
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 16, 1963No. Civ. 26575PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
This appeal by the City of Pasadena and other named defendants, hereinafter generally referred to as “appellants,” is taken from a judgment which declares that certain ordinances of appellant city regulating billboards are unconstitutional and enjoins their enforcement.
Ordinance No. 4487, hereinafter referred to as the “bill board ordinance,” provides, in part, that effective May 17, 1959, “No roof sign shall be erected, constructed, relocated or maintained upon any building excepting those which (1) bear the name of the building whereon the sign is located; (2) bear the name of the person,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- United Advertising Corp. v. Borough of RaritanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- E. B. Elliott Adv. Co., Henry F. Hill, Intervenor-Appellant v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United Business Commission v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Cromwell v. FerrierNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- United Advertising Corp. v. Borough of MetuchenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.