Legal Opinion

Patsone v. Pennsylvania

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 19, 1914No. 38PublishedCited by 327 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE COMMONWEALTH OP PENNSYLVANIA. The facts, which involve the constitutionality of the wild game statute of Pennsylvania making it unlawful for any unnaturalized foreign born resident to kill wild birds or animals and the validity of such statute as applied to an Italian citizen in view of the treaty with Italy, are stated in the opinion. The statute violates the Fourteenth Amendment.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE COMMONWEALTH OP PENNSYLVANIA. The facts, which involve the constitutionality of the wild game statute of Pennsylvania making it unlawful for any unnaturalized foreign born resident to kill wild birds or animals and the validity of such statute as applied to an Italian citizen in view of the treaty with Italy, are stated in the opinion. The statute violates the Fourteenth Amendment. It deprives persons of liberty and property without due process of law. Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. S. 27; Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U. S. 623, 661. While the legislature may have…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

The plaintiff in error was an unnaturalized foreign born resident of Pennsylvania and was complained of for owning or having in his possession a shot gun, contrary to an act of May 8, 1909. Laws, 1909, No. 261, p. 466. This statute makes it unlawful for any unnaturalized foreign born resident to kill any wild bird or animal except in defence of person or property, and ‘to that end’ makes it unlawful for such foreign born person to own or be possessed of a shot gun or rifle; with a penalty of twenty-five dollars and a forfeiture of the gun or guns. The plaintiff in error was found guilty and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Central Lumber Co. v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by327 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

322 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API